Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of English Language, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

2 M.A. Student, Department of English Language, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran


The current study aimed to investigate the representation of critical thinking in English for the Students of Medicine (II) and the status of the EAP students’ critical thinking ability as its main users. Peterson’s model was used to identify different types of critical reading questions. Furthermore, 150 students of medicine, as the main users of the textbook, completed a critical thinking questionnaire. The results revealed that a large proportion of the exercises in this textbook reflected Vocabulary in Context and Literal Comprehension questions while Extended Reasoning questions, as the major category catering for critical reading, constituted only five percent of the whole items. The results of an independent sample t-test also indicated a moderate level of critical thinking ability among the EAP students of medicine regardless of their gender. The findings call for revisiting the English for Medical Purposes materials and incorporating more activities and exercises gearing to higher-order cognitive skills and critical thinking ability to empower the EAP students with the required set of skills to be successful in their academic and professional communities.


Aliakbarim, M., & Sadeghdaghighi, A. (2011).  Investigation of the relationship between gender, field of study, and critical thinking skill: The case of Iranian students. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 301-310.
Amiryousefi, M., & Ketabi, S. (2011). Anti-textbook arguments revisited: A case study from Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 215-220.
Atai, M. R. (2002). ESAP curriculum planning in Iran: An incoherent educational experience. Special Issue of the Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 9(3), 17- 34.
Atai, M. R. (2000). ESP revisited: A reappraisal study of discipline-based EAP programs in Iran. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Baleghizadeh, S., & Rahimi, A.H. (2011). Evaluation of an ESP textbook for the students of sociology. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1009-1014.
Dehghanzadeh, Sh., & Jafaraghaee, F. (2018). Comparing the effect of traditional lecture and flipped classroom on nursing students’ critical thinking disposition: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 71, 151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.027.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eftekhari, M., Sotoudehnama, E., & Marandi, S. (2016). Computer-aided argument mapping in an EFL setting: does technology precede traditional paper and pencil approach in developing critical thinking? Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 339-357.
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32 (3), 179-186.
Eslami-Rasekh, Z.R. (2010). Teachers voice vs. students voice: A needs analysis approach to English for academic purposes (EAP) in Iran. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 2-11.
Gardner, J. N., & Jeweler,  A. J. (2000). Your college experience: Strategies for success (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current development in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (3), 375-406.
Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khatib, M. (2012). Critical thinking skills through literary and non-literary texts in English classes. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(4), 563-580.
Li, Y., Li, K., Wei, W., Dong, J., Wang, C., Fu, Y., Li, J., & Peng, X. (2021). Critical thinking, emotional intelligence and conflict management styles of medical students: A cross-sectional study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 10079. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.10079.
Liaw, M. (2007). Content-based reading and writing for critical thinking skills in an EFL context. English Teaching and Learning, 31(2), 45-87.
Maleki, A., & Kazemi, M. (2012). The Evaluation and comparison of two most widely used textbooks for teaching English to the Iranian students of medicine. The Iranian EFL Journal, 8(3), 70-93.
McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2014). Metacognitive attributes and liberated progress: The association among second-language learners’ critical thinking, creativity, and autonomy. SAGE Open, 1-10.
Peterson, S. (2008). Master critical thinking for the SAT. Author.
Rahimy, R. (2008). ESP, an evaluation of available textbooks: Medical terminology. Retrieved on January 26, 2021 from 17/PDF/ Ramin_Rahimy.pdf.
Rezaee, A. A, Taase, Y., & Alishahi, Z. (2016). Iranian domestically designed ESAP textbooks and students: a critical thinking perspective. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 47-61.
Rivers, W. M. (1981). Teaching foreign-language skills (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Sahoo, S., & Ali Mohammed, C. (2018). Fostering critical thinking and collaborative learning skills among medical students through a research protocol writing activity in the curriculum. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 30(2), 109-118. doi: 0.3946/kjme.2018.86.
Soleimani, H. (2005). EAP in Iran: drawbacks of SAMT EAP textbooks. Paper presented at the First National ESP/EAP Conference, Iran, Tehran: SAMT.
Tajeddin, Z. (2005). English for business communication. Paper presented in the First National ESP/EAP Conference, Tehran, Iran.
Talebinejad, M. R., & Matou, Z. (2012). EFL reading comprehension textbooks at university level: A critical thinking perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2, 1746-175.
Waters, A. (2006). Thinking and language learning. ELT Journal, 60(4), 237- 319.