Document Type : Original Article


Department of TEFL, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran


Learning vocabulary has always been a major concern for language learners. The current research was implemented to find out the kinds of Vocabulary Learning Strategies (popular, somehow popular, and unpopular) in Schmitt’s new taxonomy (DET, SOC, COG, MEM, MET) used by English-major students. Fifty advanced English-major students at Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman participated in this study. To this purpose, Schmitt’s Vocabulary Learning Strategies Questionnaire (VLSQ) and the last level of his Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) were used as the instruments. It was found that MEM was the most frequently used category and SOC the least frequently used one. Furthermore, COG, DET, and MET were the second, third and fourth categories respectively. The results of the study can be used by various people involved in language education including materials developers, language teachers, administrators, and other stakeholders.


  1.  Ali Askar, W. (2016). A survey on the use of vocabulary learning strategies by ELT and ELL students of Duhok University in Kurdistan. In Proceedings of The 2016 International Academic Research Conference in Milan (413-473).
  2. Brown, C., & Payne, M. E. (1994). Five essential steps of processes in vocabulary learning. Paper presented at the TESOL Convention, Baltimore Celce-Murcia, Md.
  3. Gani Hamzah, S., Kafipour, R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of iranian undergraduate efl students and its relation to their Vocabulary Size. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 39-50.
  4. Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language earning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
  5. Kirmizi, O. (2014). Measuring vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners in relation to academic success and vocabulary size. World Journal of Education, 4 (6), 16-25.
  6. Kudo, Y.(1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies (NFLRC NetWork #14) [PDF document]. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
  7. Kwiatkowski, K. (2014). Investigating the relationship between the use of vocabulary learning strategies and English language attainment. Katedra Filologii, Wydział Społeczno-Humanistyczny, Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Koninie, 2 (3), 273-291.
  8. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Kalajahi, S. A. R., & Pourshahian, B. (2012). Vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size of ELT students at EMU in Northern Cyprus. English Language Teaching5(4), 138-149.
  10.  Sener, S. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategy preferences and vocabulary size of pre-service English teachers. Educational Research Association the International Journal of Educational Researchers, 6 (3), 15-33.
  11. Wanpen, S., Sonkoontod, K., & Nonkukhetkhong, K., (2013). Technical vocabulary proficiencies and vocabulary learning strategies of engineering students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 312 – 320.
  12. Zhou, S. (2012). Investigating the use of English vocabulary learning strategies in web-based and multimedia learning environments. In. J. Cont. Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 22 (3), 185-196.