Enhancing Creative Thinking and Academic Self-Regulation in Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers through Blended Learning

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Psychology and Counselling, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Objective: This study examined whether blended learning (BL) enhances creative thinking and academic self-regulation in pre-service mathematics teachers compared to traditional instruction. The aim was to provide evidence for updating teacher education with methods that develop these essential skills for future educators.
Method: A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design was implemented. Forty-five pre-service teachers were non-randomly assigned to an experimental group (n=22) or a control group (n=23). The experimental group received a 12-session BL course on Algebraic Structures, which integrated online modules with face-to-face collaboration, while the control group received standard lecture-based instruction for identical content. Primary measures were the Welch and McDowall Creative Thinking Scale and the Bouffard Academic Self-Regulation Scale. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) was used for analysis via SPSS-26, controlling for pre-test scores. The validity of the “JabrAmoz” software was confirmed using the Content Validity Index (CVI), and its reliability was confirmed through the development of a standardized implementation protocol and the monitoring of 20% of the sessions by an observer, with a protocol adherence rate (Fidelity) of 96%.
Results: The experimental group achieved substantially higher post-test scores in both creative thinking (P < .05, η² = .246) and academic self-regulation (P < .05, η² = .117) compared to the control group. A significant group × time interaction was observed for creative thinking (F = 12.04, P < .01, η² = .215) and academic self-regulation (F = 6.78, P < .05, η² = .133). For self-regulation subcomponents, both cognitive and metacognitive strategies improved significantly in the experimental group (P < .05).
Conclusions: The findings indicated that a structured blended learning model is a more effective strategy than traditional methods for developing critical creative and self-regulatory skills in pre-service mathematics teachers, enhancing innovative thinking and metacognitive control, thus, it can equip educators for contemporary classroom demands.

Keywords

Subjects

Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2020). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5117

Allahverdiani, K., Azemode, A., Hashemi, T., & Esmaelpour, K. (2024). The effectiveness of academic life skills and self-regulation of motivation training on academic motivation of senior high school female students. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 6(24), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.22034/iepa.2024.435702.1468 [In Persian]

Amani, J., Sadeghi, M., & Khodadadi, E. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Creative Thinking Scale. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 16(35), 123–142. [In Persian]

Bahrami, F., & Nazarzadeh Zare, M. (2023). The impact of institutional factors on faculty members' use of blended learning. Technology of Education Journal, 17(3), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2023.9693.2887 [In Persian]

Bock, A., Kniha, K., Goloborodko, E., Lemos, M., Rittich, A. B., Mohlhenrich, S. C., Rafai, N., Hölzle, F., & Modabber, A. (2021). Effectiveness of face-to-face, blended and e-learning in teaching the application of local anesthesia: A randomized study. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), Article 366. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02550-2

Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01152.x

Chou, S. W., Hsieh, M. C., & Pan, H. C. (2024). Understanding the impact of self-regulation on perceived learning outcomes based on social cognitive theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(6), 1129–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2198048

Cigdem, H., & Oncu, S. (2024). Understanding the role of self-regulated learning in academic success: A blended learning perspective in vocational education. Innoeduca: International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 10(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2024.v10i1.17432

Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Effect of blended learning approach on secondary school learners' mathematics achievement and retention. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19863–19888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12651-w

Ghofrani, A., Narenji Thani, F., & Lohrashi, M. (2025). Blended learning in higher education: Key challenges. Journal of Information Technology Management, 17(3), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2025.374767.3883 [In Persian]

Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Hariadi, M. H., Warsono, W., & Wahyudi, A. (2021). The impact of collaborative model assisted by Google Classroom to improve students' creative thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20987

Kadivar, P. (2001). Validation of Bouffard's self-regulation questionnaire among Iranian students. Journal of Psychology and Education, 3(2), 45–58. [In Persian]

Kämpf, L., & Stallmach, F. (2024). Spiral-curricular blended learning for the mathematics education in physics teacher training courses. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1450607. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1450607

Karbasi, Z., Eslami, P., Zahmatkeshan, M., & Hajesmaeel Gohari, S. (2023). Investigating the effectiveness of blended learning as a new strategy for teaching anatomy to medical students: A systematic review. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 20(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.22062/sdme.2023.198828.1252 [In Persian]

Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021). The impact of blended learning on college students' creative thinking: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1523–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10010-x

Mohammadi, M., Paasivara, M., & Kasurinen, J. (2025). Blended learning in higher education: Good practices in platforms and teachers support, enhancing students motivation. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13770-8

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Sava, I. N. (2022). Social distancing impact on higher education during COVID-19 lockdown. Social Sciences, 11(9), Article 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11090419

Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). Academic Press.

Shabani, Z., Sadeghi, J., Homayouni, A., & Ghasemnejad Basra, H. (2022). The causal relationship between intelligence beliefs and performance in the chemistry course with the mediating role of emotion self-regulation in female senior high school students in Mahmudabad. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 5(17), 41–49. [In Persian]

Sheykholeslami, A. (2016). The effect of teaching critical thinking skills on students' self regulation in the first grade of upper secondary school. Research in Educational Systems, 10(35), 149–162. https://www.jiera.ir/article_48276.html [In Persian]

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2023). Blended learning in mathematics teacher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 196–222. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.36985

Uz, R., & Uzun, A. (2018). The influence of blended learning environment on self-regulated and self-directed learning skills of learners. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.877

Welch, D., & McDowall, J. (2002). A comparison of creative strategies in teaching undergraduate students in the visual arts and design. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 21(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00310

Wong, R. (2022). Basis psychological needs of students in blended learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 984–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1703010

Yanto, B., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Can blended learning model affect the independence of mathematics learning? AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 7(3), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v7i3.1559

Zhanqiang, M. (2023). Strategies for cultivating creative thinking ability of students majoring in educational technology. Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(19), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.061911