Investigating the Effectiveness of More to Math Educational Lego on Math Progress, Spatial Understanding, Working Memory, and Processing Speed Among Female First Grade of Elementary School

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
ABSTRACT
The current study examined the effectiveness of the educational Lego “More Math” on the mathematical progress, spatial understanding, working memory, and processing speed of students in female first grade of elementary school. female first-grade students. The research employed a quasi-experimental design incorporating a pre-test and post-test framework, with the inclusion of a control group. The population of this study consisted of female first-grade students studying in the schools of Tehran District 14 in the academic year 2022-2023. Among the available schools in District 14, Mihrab Girl’s Elementary School was selected as the sample. Then, 30 students were selected by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to the experimental (15 students) and control (15 students) groups. The data were collected by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V), which consisted of ten sub-tests comprising five sub-scales for fluency, language comprehension, visual-spatial reasoning, processing speed, and working memory, and the teacher-made math test. The Lego More to Math educational protocol consisted of weekly training sessions over the course of 15 weeks, with each session lasting for 60 minutes. The data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses of covariance by SPSS26.The analysis revealed significant differences between groups for spatial perception (F = 1.48, p = 0.00, η² = 0.36), working memory (F = 12.13, p = 0.00, η² = 0.32), processing speed (F = 18.16, p = 0.00, η² = 0.42), and math progress (F = 5.78, p = 0.00, η² = 0.29, test power = 0.9), with non-significant pre-test results (p = 0.88) and significant group differences (F = 11.36, p = 0.00). The study demonstrated that the Lego "More to Math" educational program significantly enhanced first graders' mathematical progress, spatial understanding, working memory, and processing speed. These findings suggested that incorporating structured, play-based learning tools like Lego into early education effectively boosted cognitive and mathematical skills in young students

Keywords

Subjects

  1. Abdulwahed, M., Jaworski, B., & Crawford, A. (2012). Innovative approaches to teaching mathematics in higher education: A review and critique.

    Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Cortical circuits for mathematical knowledge: Evidence for a major subdivision within the brain's semantic networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1740), 20160515.

    Atit, K., Power, J.R., Pigott, T., Lee, J., Geer, E.A., Uttal, D.H., Ganley, C.M., Sorby, S.A. (2022). Examining the relations between spatial skills and mathematical performance: A meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev,29(3), 699-720.

    Atit, K., Power, J. R., Veurink, N., Uttal, D. H., Sorby, S., Panther, G., Msall, C., Fiorella, L., & Carr, M. (2020a). Examining the role of spatial skills and mathematics motivation on middle school mathematical achievement. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 38.

    Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., Lim, T., Ninaus, M., Ribeiro, C., & Pereira, J. (2016). An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 94, 178–192.

    Castronovo, F., Stepanik, N., Van Meter, P. N., & Messner, J. I. (2022). Problem-solving processes in an educational construction simulation game. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 52, 101574.

    Cimadevilla, J. M., & Piccardi, L. (2020). Spatial skills. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 175, 65-79.

    Clark, D.B., Tanner-Smith, E.E.,& Killingsworth, S.S (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79 – 122.

    DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 353–386.

    Disseler, S., & Mirand, G. (2017). Students with disabilities and LEGO© education. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(3), 38-52.

    Farazandeh, F., Younesi, S. J., & Tarverdizadeh, H. (2023). Effectiveness of metacognitive learning strategies in working memory among university students. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory6(23), 52-59. doi: 10.22034/iepa.2023.419437.1449

    Fernández Cueli, M. S., Areces Martínez, D., García Fernández, T., Alves, R. A. T., & González Castro, P. (2020). Attention, inhibitory control and early mathematical skills in preschool students. Psicothema.

    Festus, A. B., & Adeyeye, A. C. (2012). The development and use of mathematical games in schools. National Mathematical Centre, Sheda-Kwali.

    Flanagan, D. P., & Mascolo, J. T. (2005). Psychoeducational assessment and learning disability diagnosis. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 521–544). The Guilford Press.

    Formoso, J., Injoque-Ricle, I., Barreyro, J.-P., Calero, A., Jacubovich, S., & Burín, D. I. (2018). Mathematical cognition, working memory, and processing speed in children. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 59–84.

    Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Schumacher, R. F., Hamlett, C. L., etal. (2012). Contributions of domain-general cognitive resources and different forms of arithmetic development to pre-algebraic knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1315.

    Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D., Powell, S., Seethaler, P., Capizzi, A., & Schatschneider, C. (2006). The cognitive correlates of thirdgrade skills in arithmetic, algorithmic computation and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 29-43.

    Fuster, J. M. (2022). Cognitive networks (Cognits) process and maintain working memory. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 15, 790691.

    Gerling, K.M., Schulte, F.P., Smeddinck, J., & Masuch, M. (2012). Game design for older adults: Effects of age-related changes on structural elements of digital games. In Herrlich, M., Malaka, R., & Masuch, M. (eds), Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2012. ICEC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7522. Springer.

    Gecü-Parmaksız, Z. (2017). Augmented reality activities for children: A comparative analysis on understanding geometric shapes and improving spatial skills.

    Gyamfi, A. (2022). Mathematics education: Any social value? Daily Graphic, 7-10.

    Hartt, M., Hosseini, H., & Mostafapour, M. (2020). Game on: Exploring the effectiveness of game-based learning. Planning Practice & Research, 35 (5), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1778859

    Hawes, Z., & Ansari, D. (2020). What explains the relationship between spatial and mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(3), 465–482. 

    Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Ferri, R. B., & Stillman, G. (2011). Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling–Preface. Springer.

    Karamalian, M., Haghayegh, S.A., & Rahimi, S. (2018). The effectiveness of child-centered play therapy on working memory and processing speed of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 9(2), 115-95. (In Persian)

    Ke, F. (2008). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5), 539-556.

    Klim-Klimaszewska, A. (2010). Pedagogika przedszkolna. Nowa podstawa programowa [Preschool pedagogy. New core curriculum]. ERICA.

    Lee-Cultura, S., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Embodied interaction and spatial skills: A systematic review of empirical studies. Interacting with Computers, 32(4), 331-366.

    LeGoff, D. B., Cuesta, G., Krauss, G., & Cohen, S. (2014). LEGO-based therapy: How to build social competence through LEGO-based clubs for children with autism and related conditions. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Liang, Z., Dong, P., Zhou, Y., Feng, S., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Whether verbal and visuospatial working memory play different roles in pupil’s mathematical abilities. Br J Educ Psychol., 92(2), e12454.

    Liben, L. S. (2013). Children's understanding of spatial representations of place: Mapping the methodological landscape. In Handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies (pp. 41-83). Psychology Press.

    Liu, S., Wei, W., Chen, Y., Hugo, P., & Zhao, J. (2021). Visual-spatial ability predicts academic achievement through arithmetic and reading abilities. Front Psychol., 9(11), 591308.

    Lourenco, S. F., Cheung, C. N., & Aulet, L. S. (2018). Is visuospatial reasoning related to early mathematical development? A critical review. In A. Henik & W. Fias (Eds.), Heterogeneity of function in numerical cognition (pp. 177–210). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811529-9.00010-8

    McDougal, E., Silverstein, P., Treleaven, O., Jerrom, L., Gilligan-Lee, K. A., Gilmore, C., & Farran, E. K. (2024). Associations and indirect effects between LEGO® construction and mathematics performance. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13376

    Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Mavrotheris, E. (2012). Game-enhanced mathematics learning for pre-service primary school teachers. ICICTE Proceedings, 455-465.

    Moradi, P., Masjedi, A., & Jafari, M. (2021). The effect of computer games on improving working memory, visual memory and control of executive performance of the elderly in Tehran. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 27(3), 316-302. (in Persian)

    Mortensen, Tine Froberg. (2012). “The LEGO Group History.” LEGO (About Us).http://aboutus.lego.com/enus/lego-group/the_lego_history/

    Nouchi, R., Saito, T., Nouchi, H., & Kawashima, R. )2016(. Small acute benefits of 4 weeks processing speed training games on processing speed and inhibition performance and depressive mood in the healthy elderly people: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Front Aging Neurosci., 23(8), 302. 

    O’Brien, J. (2019). Forming powerful MBA teams using Lego architecture. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 79-82.

    Orangi, M., Atef, V., Mohammad, K., & Eshairi, H. (1381). Normization of revised Wechsler memory scale in Shiraz city. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (Thought and Behavior), 7(4 (consecutive 28)), 56-66.) in Persian)

    Pardina-Torner, H., Carbonell, X., & Castejón , M. (2019). A comparative analysis of the processing speed between video game players and non-players. Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l’Eduació i de l’Esport, 37(1), 13-20.

    Passolunghi, M.C., & Lanfranchi, S. (2012). Domain-specific and domain-general precursors of mathematical achievement: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to first grade. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 42–63.

    Peng, P., & Kievit, R. A. (2020). The development of academic achievement and cognitive abilities: A bidirectional perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 15-20.

    Pintrich, P.R., & de Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

    PsyPost. (2024, August 25). Spatial abilities help explain the positive association between LEGO skills and mathematics performance. Retrieved from https://www.psypost.org

    Qi, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, X., & Hao, Y. (2022). How does working memory matter in young children’s arithmetic skills: The mediating role of basic number processing. Curr Psychol., 25,1-13.

    Rejeki, S., Setyaningsih, N., & Toyib, M. (2017, May). Using LEGO for learning fractions, supporting or distracting? In AIP Conference Proceedings,  1848(1),  040016

    Sadeghi, A., Rabiei, M., & Abedi, M. (1390). Validation of the fourth edition of the Kessler Children’s Intelligence Scale. Evolutionary Psychology (Iranian Psychologists), 28 (7), 386-377. (in Persian)

    Sarama, J., & Clements, D.H. (2015). Scaling up early childhood mathematics interventions: Transitioning with trajectories and technologies. In B. Perry, A. MacDonald, & A. Gervasoni (Eds.), Mathematics and Transition to School (pp. 153-169). Springer.

    Sepehrianazar, F., Parvanevatan, F., & Hendusin, S. (2023). Structural model of math anxiety with math self-efficacy and math attitude: Mediating role of numerical memory. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory6(23), 16-26. doi: 10.22034/iepa.2023.408577.1435

    Siagian, M.V., Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of learning materials oriented on problem-based learning model to improve students’ mathematical problem solving ability and metacognition ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 331-340.

    Silverman, S., & Ashkenazi, S. (2022). The unique role of spatial working memory for mathematics performance. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(1), 226–243.

    Swanson, H. L. (2006). Cognitive processes that underlie mathematical precociousness in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(3), 239-264.

    Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., & Kawashima, R. (2010). Effects of working memory training on cognitive functions and neural systems. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 21(6), 427-450.

    Tikhomirova, T., Malykh, A., & Malykh, S. (2020). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive abilities: Cross-sectional study across school education. Behavioral Sciences, 10(10), 158.

    Uhlenberg, J. M., & Geiken, R. (2021). Supporting young children’s spatial understanding: Examining toddlers’ experiences with contents and containers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(1), 49-60.

    Uttal, D.H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352.

    Xia, L., & Zhong, B. (2018). A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12. Computers & Education, 127, 267-282.

    Xie, F., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Xin, Z. (2020). Is spatial ability related to mathematical ability: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 113–155. 

    Ziv, G., Lidor, R., & Levin, O. (2022). Reaction time and working memory in gamers and non-gamers. Sci Rep, 12, 67-98.