Diagnosing Cognitive Impairments of Cyber Addiction with QEEG and Investigating the Effectiveness of Cognitive Intervention on the Cognitive Functions Involved in the Mental Imagery of Adolescents

Azhdarloo, Mohammad; Soleymani Khashab, Abbas Ali

doi:10.22034/iepa.2024.420701.1450

Diagnosing Cognitive Impairments of Cyber Addiction with QEEG and Investigating the Effectiveness of Cognitive Intervention on the Cognitive Functions Involved in the Mental Imagery of Adolescents

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mohammad Azhdarloo ¹

Abbas ali soleymani khashab ²

¹ MA General Psychology, Islamic Azad University Marvdasht branch, Marvdasht, iran.

² faculty member of Psychology, Social and Cultural Faculty, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, I.R.Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/iepa.2024.420701.1450

Abstract

Human society faces new challenges, especially the ones damaging the human brain and cognition. The addictive use of cyberspace essentially causes these challenges. This study was a comparative descriptive-analytical study conducted to diagnose cognitive impairments of cyber addiction through a QEEG test and to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive intervention on the cognitive functions involved in the mental imagery of adolescents. The statistical population of the study included 9-12 year-old students who visited Mehraz Andisheh clinic in Shiraz. The available sampling method was used and 40 people with research conditions (including 20 girls and 20 boys) were randomly assigned to two control and experimental groups. This research was conducted in 2023. The study used a mobile-based social network addiction diagnosis questionnaire (Ahmadi et al.; 2015), software (RehaCom et al., IVA-2, Neuroguide), an EEG device, and Kim Carrad visual memory test. After being selected and called to the place of research, people who had the conditions to enter the study first completed the consent form. Then, the EEG recording was conducted for 5 minutes with eyes open and closed. Also, as a pre-test, they performed a visual attention test (IVA-2) for visual memory (Kim Carrad test) and a visual processing test (Captain Log). Then, for ten sessions, the participants in the experimental group received cognitive rehabilitation by RehaCom software, each lasting for 45 minutes with an interval of one day. After the completion of the treatment sessions, the evaluations were repeated. In this research data analysis was done using SPSS software 26 and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The study findings showed that the cognitive intervention led to a significant difference at the 0.05 level in the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group while there was no significant difference between the pre-test and the post-test in the control group. Based on the results, it can be seen that the intervention led to a difference in the pre-test and post-test and a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test groups in the experimental group at the 0.05 level. The study results also showed a significant relationship between the cognitive impairments of cyber addiction and brain wave patterns. These results emphasize that brain signals may be used as an indicator to diagnose cognitive impairment in people with cyber addiction. Also, the results showed that RehaCom software could improve the cognitive functions involved in the mental imagery of teenagers suffering from Internet addiction.

Keywords

Adolescents

Cognitive intervention

Cyber addiction

mental imagery

QEEG test

Subjects

Psychology of Human Behavior

Akbari, M. (2017). Metacognitions or distress intolerance: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic internet use. Addict Behav Rep., 26 (6),128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.10.004. PMID: 29450248; PMCID: PMC5800590.

Anderson, E. L., Steen, E., & Stavropoulos, V. (2017). Internet use and problematic internet use: A systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716

Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R., & Johnstone, S. J. (2019). A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. Qualitative and quantitative electroencephalography. Clinical Neurophysiology, 130(11), 2057-2071.

Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A.M., Senol-Durak, E., Durak, M., & Sherstyuk, L. (2017). The role of personality traits in Facebook and Internet addictions: A study on Polish, Turkish, and Ukrainian samples. Comput. Hum. Behav., 68, 269-275.

Brand, M., Young, K.S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M.N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev., 71, 252-266. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Aug 30. PMID: 27590829.

Farrokh Alaee, F., Soleimani, H., Haghir, H., Aghayusefi, A., & Jafarigohar, M. (2020). Multisensory teaching and beta and SMR oscillatory activities in foreign language vocabulary retention: A Neurolinguistic study. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 3(11), 7-25. doi: 10.22034/iepa.2021.251487.1214

Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2018). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. W.W. Norton & Company.

Heinrichs, R. W., & Zakzanis, K. K. (2019). Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology, 11(3), 417-442.

Herculano-Houzel, S. (2019). The human advantage: A new understanding of how our brain became remarkable. MIT Press.

Insel, T. R. (2018). Rethinking schizophrenia. Nature, 468(7321), 187-193.

Khajeahmadi, M., Pooladi, S., & Bahreini, M. (2017). Design and assessment of psychometric properties of the addiction to mobile questionnaire based on social networks. IJPN , 4 (4), 43-51.

King, D.L., Delfabbro, P.H., Doh, Y.Y., Wu, A.M.S., Kuss, D.J., Pallesen, S., Mentzoni, R., Carragher, N., & Sakuma, H. (2018). Policy and prevention approaches for disordered and hazardous gaming and internet use: an international perspective. Prev Sci., 19(2), 233-249. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0813-1. PMID: 28677089.

King, D.L., Herd, M.C.E., & Delfabbro, P.H. (2017). Tolerance in Internet gaming disorder: A need for increasing gaming time or something else? J Behav Addict., 6(4), 525-533. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.072. Epub 2017 Nov 15. PMID: 29137493; PMCID: PMC6034956.

Kornoghabi, R., Asoudeh, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2022). The Effectiveness of wisdom therapy approach in reducing internet addiction of adolescent female students. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 5(18), 25-32. doi: 10.22034/iepa.2022.167719

Kuss, D.J., & Griffiths, M.D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction--a review of the psychological literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 8(9), 3528-52. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8093528. Epub 2011 Aug 29. PMID: 22016701; PMCID: PMC3194102.

Lezak, M. D. (1983). A clinician's perspective of neuropsychological assessment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 5(1-3), 8-10.

Logothetis, N. K. (2018). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453(7197), 869-878.

Makinodan, M., & Komori, T. (2019). Neuroplasticity along the lifespan. Neuroscience Research, 138, 59-64.

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis‐testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341.

Merzenich, M. M., & DeCharms, R. (2018). Neural representations, experience, and change. MIT Press.

Montag, C., Błaszkiewicz, K., Sariyska, R. et al. Smartphone usage in the 21st century: who is active on WhatsApp?. BMC Res Notes 8, 331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1280-z

Snyder, H. R., & Hutchison, N. (2019). Neuroimaging-based markers for the detection and quantification of cognitive impairment and treatment monitoring. In Cognitive and Functional Neuroimaging (pp. 281-312). Springer.

Sporns, O. (2018). Structure and function of complex brain networks. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 20(3), 187-198.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.

Thakor, N. V., & Tong, S. (2018). Advances in Quantitative Electroencephalogram Analysis Methods. In Quantitative EEG Analysis Methods and Clinical Applications (pp. 1-21). CRC Press.

Thatcher, R. W. (2019). Quantitative EEG and neurofeedback in the 21st century: Current status, future directions. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 50(1), 3-15.

Wee, C.Y., Zhao, Z., Yap, P.T., Wu, G., Shi, F., Price, T., Du, Y., Xu, J., Zhou Y, & Shen D. (2014). Disrupted brain functional network in internet addiction disorder: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. PLoS One, 9(9), e107306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107306. PMID: 25226035; PMCID: PMC4165900.

Weinstein, A., & Lejoyeux, M. (2010). Internet addiction or excessive internet use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse, 36(5), 277-83. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2010.491880. PMID: 20545603.

Wu, A.M.S., Chen, J.H., Tong, K.K., Yu, S., Lau J.T.F. (2018). Prevalence and associated factors of Internet gaming disorder among community dwelling adults in Macao, China. J Behav Addict., 7(1),62-69. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.12. Epub 2018 Feb 21. PMID: 29463097; PMCID: PMC6035015.

Yuste, R. (2019). From the neuron doctrine to neural networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(6), 324-337