Explaining the Role of Environmental Factors on the Scholastic Aptitude of Ninth-Grade Students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Assessment and Measurment, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
This study was aimed at clarifying the position of environment and heredity in scholastic aptitude by investigating the role of family, educational, and economic factors in the scholastic aptitude of ninth-grade students. This applied study adopted a quantitative approach and a descriptive causal- comparative method in terms of data collection. The statistical population of the research included all 1,234,641 students in the ninth grade of the secondary schools in Iran in the academic year of 2020–2021. The sample size contained 11790 students selected through proportionate stratified random sampling. The data were collected using a 64-question Scholastic Aptitude Test and analyzed using descriptive statistics as well as the MANOVA using the SPSS 25 software. The research results showed that among the family factors, the mother's educational level; among the educational factors, the type of school and educational assistance classes; and among the economic factors, the family income, had a significant role in the students' scholastic aptitude (P < 0.05). Moreover, the linear combination of family factors and educational factors does not have a significant role in scholastic aptitude while the linear combination of economic factors has a significant role. In general, among family, economic, and educational factors, economic factors have a more significant role in scholastic aptitude.

Keywords

Subjects

Aberg-Bengtsson, L. (2005). Separating quantitative and analytic dimensions in the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test (SweSAT). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(4), 359–383.
Akpotor, J., & Egbule, E. (2020). Gender difference in the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT) among school adolescents. World Journal of Education, 10(1), 97–101.
Andersen, D. (2005). 4 år efter grundskolen. 19-årige om valg og veje i ungdomsuddannels- erne [Four years after basic school. Choices and strategies of the 19-year-old in youth education]. AKF Forlaget
Anderson, E. (2004). Rethinking equality of opportunity: Comment on Adam Swift’s How not to be a hypocrite.
Bauer, C. A., Job, V., & Hannover, B. (2023). Who gets to see themselves as talented? Biased self-concepts contribute to first-generation students’ disadvantage in talent-focused environments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 108, 104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104501.
Bazán, A., Castellanos, D., & Fajardo, V. (2020). Family variables, intellectual aptitudes, and Mexican students’ reading achievement. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 18(52), 375–398.
Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., & Suchy, E. (1996). The impact of SMPY’s educational programs from the perspective of the participant. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual, talent: Psychometrical and social issues (pp. 266–300). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Blanch, A., & Aluja, A. (2013). A regression tree of the aptitudes, personality, and academic performance relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.032
Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. Ballantine.
Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language Learning, 70(1), 11–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12368
Bouchard, T. J. (1997). IQ similarity in twins reared apart: Findings and responses to critics. In R. J. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and envi- ronment (pp. 126–160). Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 46–58). Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Sage.
Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2014). The place of educational equality in educational justice. In K. Meyer (Ed.), Education, justice, and the human good: Fairness and equality in the education system (pp. 14–33). Routledge.
Burrs, A. (2013). The effect of personality preferences on the 2005 version of the SAT. In ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC.
Calvert, J. (2014). Educational equality: Luck egalitarian, pluralist and complex. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12048
Choudhury, P., Ganguli, I., & Gaulé, P. (2023). Top talent, elite colleges, and migration: Evidence from the Indian Institutes of Technology. Journal of Development Economics, 164, 103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103120.
Cooper, T. C., Yanosky, D. J., Wisenbaker, J. M., Jahner, D., Webb, E., & Wilbur, M. L. (2008). Foreign Language Learning and SAT Verbal Scores Revisited. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03289.x
Coyle, T. R. (2015). Relations among general intelligence (g), aptitude tests, and GPA: Linear effects dominate. Intelligence, 53, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.005
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to excellence. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Feldhusen, J. F. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. In Conceptions of giftedness, 2nd ed (pp. 64–79). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.006
Fernández, E., García, T., Gómez, C., Areces, D., & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Creativity and perceived multiple intelligences as predictors of scholastic aptitude in primary education. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 17(49), 589–608.
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682
Gagne, F. (2007). Ten commandments for academic talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986206296660
Gagné, F. (2015). Academic talent development programs: A best practices model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9366-9
Gagné, F., & St Père, F. (2001). When IQ is controlled, does motivation still predict achievement? Intelligence, 30(1), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00068-X
Giesinger, J. (2011). Education, fair competition, and concern for the worst off. Educational Theory, 61(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00390.x
Hadar, B., Katzir, M., Pumpian, S., Karelitz, T., & Liberman, N. (2023). Psychological proximity improves reasoning in academic aptitude tests. Npj Science of Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00158-x.
Hansen, E. J. (1995). En generation blev voksen. Den første velfærdsgeneration [The growing up of a generation. The first welfare state generation] (95:8). Socialforskningsinstituttet.
Holahan, C. K., & Sears, R. R. (1995). The witted group in later maturity. Stanford University Press.
Jarvin, L., & Subotnik, R. F. (2015). Academic Talent Development in North America and Europe. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9370-0
Krisna, I. I., Mardapi, D., & Azwar, S. (2016). Determining standard of academic potential based on the Indonesian Scholastic Aptitude Test (TBS) benchmark. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.8465
Kulkarni, S., Parry, J., & Sitch, A. (2022). An assessment of the impact of formal preparation activities on performance in the University Clinical Aptitude Test (UCAT): A national study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 747. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03811-y.
Lee, Y., & Seo, E. (2019). Trajectories of implicit theories and their relations to scholastic aptitude: A mediational role of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101800
Manichander, T., & Brindhamani, M. (2014). Academic Achievement and Scientific Aptitude in Science among the Students of Standard-X. Online Submission 1(1), 304–310. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED557153
Matejko, A. A., Price, G. R., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Ansari, D. (2013). Individual differences in left parietal white matter predict math scores on the Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test. NeuroImage, 66, 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.045
Meyer, K. (2021). Talents, abilities and educational justice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(8), 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1742696
Piirto, J. (1999). Implications of postmodern curriculum theory for the education of the talented. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22(4), 324–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329902200402
Piirto, J. (2015). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. Prufrock Press.
Plomin, R. (1997). Identifying genes for cognitive abilities and disabilities. In R. J. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 89–104). Cambridge University Press.
Rasmussen, A., & Rasmussen, P. (2015). Conceptions of student talent in the context of talent development. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(4), 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916013
Rasmussen, P. (1999). Social arv i uddannelsesprocessen. Arbejdspapir 27 om social arv [Social inheritance in the educational process. Working paper no. 27 on social inheritance]. Socialforskningsinstituttet.
Sachs, B. (2012). The limits of fair equality of opportunity. Philosophical Studies, 160(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11098-011-9721-6
Satz, D. (2007). Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics, 117(4), 623–648. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 518805
Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior–genetic and socialization theories of intelligence: Truce and reconciliation. In R. J. Sternberg & I. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 3–41). Cambridge University Press.
Schalkwyk, G. J. van. (2011). Scholastic Aptitude Test. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology (pp. 2214–2217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1487
Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2009). Practitioners’ conceptions of academic talent and giftedness: Essential factors in deciding classroom and school composition. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(3), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902000302
Shatunova, O., & Sterz, O. (2018). The structure of the person’s technical aptitude and factors of its development. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 239–250.
Shields, L. (2015). From Rawlsian autonomy to sufficient opportunity in education. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 14(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X13505413
Simonton, D. K. (1997). When acumen becomes genius: How does talent achieve eminence? In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of witted education (pp. 335–352). Allyn & Bacon.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius. Vol. V. The gifted group at mid-life (pp. xiii, 187). Stanford University Press.
Thunnissen, M., & Van Arensbergen, P. (2015). A multi-dimensional approach to talent: An empirical analysis of the definition of talent in Dutch academia. Personnel Review, 44(2), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2013-0190
Ulriksen, L., Murning, S., & Ebbensgaard, A. B. (2009). Når gymnasiet er en fremmed verden. Eleverfaringer – social baggrund – fagligt udbytte [When high school represents an unknown culture. Student experiences – social background – academic achievement]. Samfundslitteratur.
Vadivu, P. P., Sridhar, R., & Kumar, B. M. (2016). Construction and standardization of Scientific Aptitude Test (SAT) for secondary school students-a pilot study. Online Submission, 3(1), 17–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED586309
Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., Van der Sluis, S., Posthuma, D., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). The heritability of aptitude and exceptional talent across different domains in adolescents and young adults. Behavior Genetics, 39(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9260-5.
Vopat, M. C. (2011). Magnet schools, innate talent and social justice. Theory and Research in Education, 9(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878510394811.
Wachs, T. D. (1992). The nature and nurturance. Sage.
Wai, J., & Lovett, B. J. (2021). Improving gifted talent development can help solve multiple consequential real-world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020031
Wai, J., Lakin, J. M., & Kell, H. J. (2022). Specific cognitive aptitudes and gifted samples. Intelligence, 92, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101650.
Young, J. W., & Fisler, J. L. (2000). Sex differences on the SAT: An analysis of demographic and educational variables. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007099012828.
Zivari Rahman, M. (2022). Preparation and standardization of scholastic aptitude test for ninth grade high school [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tehran.