Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Peer Review Process

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Journal Metrics

FAQ

News

Related Links

Guide to Registration

Article Writing Guide

Manuscript Template

References Guideline

Forms

List of Reviewers in 2019

List of Reviewers in 2020

List of Reviewers in 2021

List of Reviewers in 2022

Towards a Consensual Definition of Learning: Insights from the Aristotelian Philosophy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of Department of Foreign Languages, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Department of Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of Department of TEFL, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

What is learning after all? Being the cornerstone of educational psychology, this question has not lost its appeal since there still is no consensus over it. What makes providing a careful definition of learning important is that such definitions carry important pedagogical implications which might not be equally beneficial. This theoretical paper, therefore, has tried to define learning by a novel interdisciplinary approach through connecting educational psychology to philosophy. It has started with the dilemma of a lack of consensus over the definition of definition itself and the necessity for holding a theory of definition. Consequently, Aristotle’s definition theory has been chosen. To be impartial, it has been contrasted with that adopted by Karl Popper- Aristotle’s major critic. Then, mainstream leaning definitions have been investigated. Their inadequacy has been attributed to their non-adherence to a tenable definition theory. The paper recommends a framework for learning definition studies established by adopting Aristotle’s definition theory and other points discussed. Such a framework constitutes guidelines for future studies. These guidelines give future definition studies direction and coherence and allow us to move away from idiosyncrasies reflecting personal bias and, as such, they can direct us towards developing a consensual definition.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Boblett, N. (2012). Scaffolding: Defining the metaphor. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 1-16. https://tesolal.columbia.edu/article/scaffolding-defining-the-metaphor/   
Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford University Press.
Büttemeyer, W. (2005). Popper on definitions. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 36(1), 15–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-005-6037-2
Cattrysse, P. (2014). Descriptive adaptation studies: Epistemological and methodological issues. Garant.
De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Moors, A. (2013). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 631-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0386-3
De Praetere, T. (1993). The demonstration by refutation of the principle of non-contradiction in Aristotle’s metaphysics, book IV. Logique & Analyse, 36(143-144), 343-358.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Perigree Books.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Beacon Press.
Dubislav, W. (1931). Die definition (3rd ed.). F. Meiner.
Dubs, H. H. (1943). Definition and its problems. The Philosophical Review, 52(6), 566-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2181259
du Sautoy, M. (2011). The number mysteries: A mathematical odyssey through everyday life. Palgrave Macmillan.
Fetzer, J. H. (1991). Aspects of the theory of definition. In J. H. Fetzer, D. Shatz, & G. N. Schlesinger (Eds.), Definitions and definability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 3-20). Springer Science.
Firey, T. A. (1999). Socrates’ conception of knowledge and the priority of definition (Master’s thesis). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4038/e92063aa564512dbf2b76dd815b3a5502a56.pdf
Gottlieb, P. (2019). Aristotle on non-contradiction. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/aristotle-noncontradiction/
Grayson, M. (2010). Introduction: Curiosity aroused. Nature, 467(7317), S2–S3. https://doi.org/10.1038/467S2a
Gupta, A. (2019). Definitions. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/definitions
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theories: The role of epistemology, science, and technology. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1-39). Sprinter International Publishing.
Hebenstreit, G. (2009). Defining patterns in translation studies: Revisiting two classics of German translationswissenschaf. In Y. Gambier, & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), The metalanguage of translation (pp. 9-26). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hermans, T. (2013). What is (not) translation?, In C. Millán & F. Bartrina (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of translation studies (pp. 75-87). Routledge.
Hudry, J. -L. (2013). Aristotle on non-contradiction: Philosophers vs. non-philosophers. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 7(2), 51-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v7i2p51-74
Hurley, P. J., & Watson, L. (2018). A concise introduction to logic. Cengage Learning.
Husain, M. (2002). Ontology and the art of tragedy: An approach to Aristotle’s poetics. State University of New York Press.
Introductory logic: The fundamentals of thinking well (5th ed.). (1997). Canon Press.
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. Routledge.
Karuzis, J. (2010). The principle of non-contradiction in Aristotle’s metaphysics. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(16), 231-254.
Kneale, W., & Kneale, M. (1971). The development of logic. Oxford University Press.
Kublikowski, R. (2009). Definition within the structure of argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 16(29), 229-244.
Lachman, S. J. (1997). Learning is a process: Toward an improved definition of learning. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 131(5), 477-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223989709603535
Lewis, C. I. (1923). A pragmatic conception of the a priori. The Journal of Philosophy, 20(7), 169-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2939833
Luk, R. W. P. (2010). Understanding scientific study via process modelling. Foundations of Science, 15(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-009-9168-9
Maritain, J. (1937). The degrees of knowledge (B. Wall & M. R. Adamson, Trans.). Geoffrey Bles.
Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning, Science, 325(5938), 284-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1175626
Pilkington, O. A. (2019a). Definitions of scientific terminology in popular science books: An examination of definitional chains. Science Communication, 41(5), 580-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547019861397
Pilkington, O. A. (2019b). The language of popular science: Analyzing the communication of advanced ideas to lay readers. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
Policano, D. (2018).  The beginning of good data is the definition of terms. Stanford Social Innovation Review.  https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_beginning_of_good_data_is_the_definition_of_terms
Popper, K. (2013). The open society and its enemies. Princeton University Press.
Porte, G. K. (2002). Appraising research in second language learning: A practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Prior, N. (1949). Determinables, determinates and determinants. Mind, LVIII(229), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/LVIII.229.1
Quigley, S. C. (2016). Improving opportunities for mathematical learning amongst students identified as having behavioural, emotional and social difficulties within a special school environment (Doctoral dissertation).  http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/69052/
Reiss, J., & Sprenger, J. (2017). Scientific objectivity. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/scientific-objectivity/
Riazi, A. M. (2016). The Routledge encyclopedia of research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Routledge.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Pearson Education Ltd.
Robinson, R. (1965). Definition. The Clarendon Press.
Sager, J. C. (2000). Essays on definition. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Optimising learning: Implications of learning sciences research. In OECD (Ed.), Innovating to learn, learning to innovate (pp. 45-65). Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Sell, J. (2018). Definitions and the development of theory in social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(1), 8–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0190272518755335
Studtmann, P. (2008). The foundations of Aristotle’s categorial scheme. Marquette University Press.
Teyke, T. (1995). Food-attraction conditioning in the snail, Helix Pomatia. Journal of Computational Physiology A, 177(4), 409–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00187477
Uncapher, M. R. (2019). From the science of learning (and development) to learning engineering. Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 349-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1421437
Vaneechoutte, M. (2000). Experience, awareness and consciousness: Suggestions for definitions as offered by an evolutionary approach. Foundations of Science, 5(4), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011371811027
Veltman, K. H. (2004). Towards a semantic web for culture. Journal of Digital Information, 4(4), 1-87.
von Mettenheim, C. (1999). The problem of objectivity in law and ethics. In I. Jarvie, & S. Pralong (Eds.), Popper’s open society after fifty years: The continuing relevance of Karl Popper (pp. 110-126). Routledge. 
Walton, D. (2005). Deceptive arguments containing persuasive language and persuasive definitions. Argumentation, 19(2), 159-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2312-y
Weaver, J. (2015). How one-shot learning unfolds in the brain. PLOS Biology, 13(4), e1002138, 1-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002138
Woolfolk, A. E., Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2003). Educational psychology (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Woolfolk, A., & Margetts, K. (2013). Educational psychology (3rd ed.). Pearson Australia.
Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), 479-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20508
Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory
Volume 3, Issue 12 - Serial Number 12
January 2021
Pages 7-18
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics