Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Peer Review Process

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Journal Metrics

FAQ

News

Related Links

Guide to Registration

Article Writing Guide

Manuscript Template

References Guideline

Forms

List of Reviewers in 2019

List of Reviewers in 2020

List of Reviewers in 2021

List of Reviewers in 2022

A Case Study of Iranian Physics Education Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Physics, Shahid Rajaee University, Lavizan, Tehran 16788, Iran

Abstract

This paper studied Iranian Physics education students’ understanding of the nature of science. The research is descriptive and was conducted through a survey study method. The sample of our study consisted of 94 students of Physics education in the second and third year of university. They were selected through random sampling from four classes at Isfahan University and Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University in Iran. For this purpose, 24 statements of the SUSSI questionnaire (Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry) were translated into Farsi. The statements were randomly arranged to form a new questionnaire. The validity of the new questionnaire was examined and approved and the Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire was calculated as 0.738. In the data analysis phase, the mean score of each statement was calculated using the frequency and the numerical value of each response. The score of each component of the nature of science was determined by averaging the scores of the statements related to that component. The average score of each component expresses the formal or naïve or transitional view regarding that component. According to the results, while our subjects’ attitude to observation and deduction conformed to international standards of science education, they had some misunderstandings regarding the other components of scientific inquiry. As physics education students will become teachers and contribute to the future generation's view of science, it would be better to incorporate more educational activities into teacher education programs with the aim of improving the trainees’ conception of science.

Keywords

References
Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views on Science-Technology-Society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bell, R. L. (2009). Teaching the nature of science: Three critical questions. Best Practices in Science Education, 22,1-6.
Ben-Ari, M. (2005). Just a theory: Exploring the nature of science. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90, 803-819.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Bukingham, England: Open University Press.
Einstein, A. (1954). Ideas and Opinions, trans. S.    Bargmann, New York, NY: Crown.
Hun-Young OH and Norman G. Lederman. (2018). Using an Explicit NOS Flow Map in Instruction of Nature of Science Based on the Science of Philosophy. Turkish Science Education, 15(3),64-90.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
Lederman, N. G., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abel & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp.831-879). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
Liang, L. L., Chen, S., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J. (2008). Assessing preservice elementary teachers' views on the nature of scientific knowledge: A Dual-response instrument. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1-20.
Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 55.
McComas, W., Clough, M., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed). The Nature of Science in Science Education, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. Science & Education, 7(6), 511-532.
Meichtry, Y. J. (1999). The nature of science and scientific knowledge: Implications for a preservice elementary methods course. Science & Education, 8(3), 273-286.
National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Research Council.
National Science Teachers Association (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC. The National Academic Press.
Schwab, J.J. (1965). Biological sciences curriculum study: Biology Teachers' Handbook. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Wilson L. (1954) A study of opinions related to the nature of science and its purpose in society. Science Education, 38, 159-164.
Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory
Volume 3, Issue 12 - Serial Number 12
January 2021
Pages 51-60
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics