Cross-linguistic Gender Differences in EFL Learners’ Pause Frequency and Duration

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Foreign Languages, Yazd University, Iran

2 Foreign Languages Department, Yazd University

10.22034/iepa.2020.239311.1187

Abstract

The present paper sought to investigate gender differences in the speech pauses made by Iranian bilingual (L1: Turkish and L2: Persian) learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). To this end, the pauses made by males and females were compared. Via an Oxford Placement test, a convenient sample of 40 bilingual advanced EFL male and female learners were selected from several English language institutes in Tehran, Iran. Three reading passages (English, Persian, and Turkish) were used to measure students’ fluency in terms of their speech pauses in the texts they read. As learners started to read the passages, their speeches were recorded. The collected data were analyzed by means of Praat Software. The data were analyzed in terms of the frequency and duration of the recorded pauses. The results indicated that that there were not any statistically significant differences between males and females regarding their pause frequency and duration across languages. Accordingly, the results represented more similarity than difference across the groups. The implications of the study results are discussed.

Keywords


Acton, E. K. (2011). On gender differences in the distribution of um and uh. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics17(2), 1-9.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.42). Retrieved from www.praat.org.
Cameron, D. (2007). Unanswered questions and unquestioned assumptions in the study of language and gender: Female verbal superiority. Gender & Language1(1), 15-26.
Chambers, J. K. (2009). Sociolinguistic theory: linguistic variation and its social significance (3rd Ed.). UK: Wiley-Backwell.
Eisler, F. G.  (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic Press.
Fletcher, J. (2010). The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm. In W. J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, & F. E. Gibbin (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (2nd ed., pp. 523–602). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1972). Pauses, clauses, sentences. Language and Speech15(2), 103-113.
Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships. New York: Harper Collins.
Henton, C. (1999). Where is female synthetic speech? Journal of the International Phonetic Association29(1), 51-61.
Howell, P., & Kadi-Hanifi, K. (1991). Comparison of prosodic properties between read and spontaneous speech material. Speech Communication10(2), 163-169.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist60(6), 581-592.
Kendall, T. S. (2009). Speech rate, pause, and linguistic variation: An examination through the sociolinguistic archive and analysis project (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). Durham, NC: Duke University.
Khojastehrad, S. (2012). Gender differentiation in the application of hesitation strategies among EFL learners. Advances in Asian Social Science1(2), 205-211.
Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America87(2), 820-857.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper Colophon.
Liberman, M. (2006). Sex on the brain. Women use 20,000 words a day, men only 7,000 – or so says a new bestseller. Fact-checking “The Female Brain”. Boston Globe, 24 September 2006, D1.
Ling, G., Powers, D. E., & Adler, R. M. (2014). Do TOEFL iBT® scores reflect improvement in English-language proficiency? extending the TOEFL iBT validity argument. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–16.
Samuelsson, Y. (2006). Gender effects on phonetic variation and speaking styles. A literature study. GSLT Speech Technology Term Paper, 1, 1–8. 
Spender, D. (1998). Extracts from Man Made Language. In D. Cameron (Ed.), The Feminist Critique of Language: A reader (2nd ed., pp. 93-99). London: Routledge.
Tannen, D. (1996). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Titze, I. R. (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America85(4), 1699-1707.
Ullakonoja, R. (2008).Pausing as an Indicator of Fluency in the Russian of Finnish Learners. In P. A. Barbosa, S. Madureira & C. Reis (Eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008 Conference, (pp.339-342). Campinas, Brazil: Editora.
West, C. D., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1977). Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction. Social Problems24(5), 521-529.
Wainer, H., & Lukhele, R. (1997). How reliable are TOEFL scores? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(5), 741–758.
Whiteside, S. P. (1996). Temporal-based acoustic-phonetic patterns in read speech: Some evidence for speaker sex differences. Journal of the International Phonetic Association26(1), 23-40.