The Comparison between the Effectiveness of Two Educational Methods of Learning by Summarizing, and Learning through Teaching on the Comprehension Male Students

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Psychology, Science & Research University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Psychology, Science & Research University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Psychology, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/iepa.2020.215996.1147

Abstract

The present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of two educational methods of learning by summarizing, and learning through teaching on the comprehension of sixth grade elementary male students. This was an applied study and the research design was experimental with a pre-test and post-test approach and the control group. The study population included all sixth grade male students at Allameh Tabataba'i School, who were studying in the academic year of 2018-2019. The random available sampling method was used in this study. The total number of students were 59, all of which were participated in the study and divided into three different groups by random convenience sampling method. Then, the first experiment group members (15 subjects) were trained in 8 learning sessions through teaching method. The subjects in the second experimental group (15 subjects) were trained in 8 learning sessions by summarizing method. The control group (n = 29) received no training. Two researcher-made questionnaires were designed to assess the comprehension level of the students. The data were analyzed using analysis of covariance in the SPSS software. Emphasizing the findings of the research, it can be argued that both learning methods had a favorable effect on the students' comprehension, and increased the students' comprehension level. Based on these findings, one can conclude that these two educational methods have a great impact on increasing the comprehension of sixth grade elementary students.

Keywords


Ali Bakhshi, S. Z., & Zare, H. (2010). The efficacy of learning self-regulation instruction and study skills on students’ educational achievement. Quarterly Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(15), 69-80.
Cartwright, K. B. (2002). Cognitive development and reading: The relation of reading-specific multiple classification skill to reading comprehension in elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1),56-63.
Derossis, A. M., Rosa, D. D., Schwartz, A., Hauge, L. S., & Bordage, G. (2004). Study habits of surgery residents and performance on American Board of Surgery In-Training examinations. Am J Sur, 188(3), 230- 236.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning strategies: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 281-288.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Haghverdi, H. R., Biria, R., & Karimi, L. (2010). The effect of note-taking strategy instruction on the students' academic achievement. Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(2), 123-151.
Huang, J., Yu, Z. L., & Gu, Z. (2018). A clustering method based on extreme learning machine. Neuro­computing, 277, 108-119.
Khadivi, A. A., Aqdasi, A. N., & Samdian, M. (2012). The effects of the study methods on high school students’ academic achievement in Bonab. Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 13-26.
Myers, K. P. (2018). The convergence of psychology and neurobiology in flavor-nutrient learning. Appetite, 122, 36-43.
Nandhini, K., & Balasundaram, S. R. (2013). Improving readability through extractive summarization for learners with reading difficulties. Egyptian Informatics Journal14(3), 195-204.
Pressley, M., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Snyder, B. L. (1995). Reading comprehension strategies. In M. Pressley & V. Woloshyn (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (pp. 57–100). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Reeder, C. M. (2010). The role of trait achievement motivation and ability in predicting academic performance trajectories. Ph.D. Thesis. Michigan State University, Michigan.
Rezaei, S., Hashemi Razini, H., & Karimi, A. (2014). Advanced quantitative and qualitative research design. Tehran: Fanni
Salem Safi, R., Rezaei, N A., Sheikh, N., Khoshkalam, M., Makhdoomi, K., Nabiloo, B., & Bani Adam, A. (2011). A review of study methods and study resources used by students of Urmia University of Medical Sciences in 2006.  Uroomiyeh Journal of Nursery, 8(2), 76-82
Seif, A. A. (2001). Educational psychology, learning and teaching psychology (New Ed.). Tehran: Agah.
Seif, A. A. (2016). Learning and study methods (2nd Ed.). Tehran: Doran
Shabani, H. (2015). Educational and training skills - Volume I (Teaching Methods and Techniques)] Tehran: Humanities Research and Development Center.
Sharifi, P., & Rahmati, A. (2012). The effects of note taking skills instruction on students’ educational self-efficiency. Journal of Studies Center and Medicine Instruction Development, 1, 27-35.
Tousi, B. (2006). Study skills (7th Ed.). Mashhad: Taraneh.